Spidey

The main difference that I see between the two is that the first one, obviously a critic, focuses on how the mechanics of the film worked and on details in the presentation of the story while the second one seems to be written by just a fan. The Fan focuses on the story itself and why it’s just a “great movie for everyone”. This actually leads me to doubt some of his views because he didn’t establish any credibility for himself. In one part of the reviews, they both cite the same scene, when aunt may is giving Peter a speech, the critic talks about how it was too long and drawn out, but the fan talks about the emotion that was conveyed and the fact that the actress got more than a cameo role. This is represenitive of most of the movie; the two writers have starkly different viewpoints but somehow come to a similar conclusion. They are both similar in the fact that they both say at the end that it was a good movie, but each one has a different tone in how they do it. You can tell from the writers ideas that the fan is writing from an excited satisfied view, but the critic, is well, writing from a critics point of view saying “that it was a good movie, but…….” All in all these two writes share much but take very different paths to get to a similar conclusion